A Press Release was issued by the Colorado Division of Securities in September, 2015, regarding an agreement to enter a Cease and Desist Order with respect to Tennyson Place, LLC, Allante Properties, LLC, Darell Schmidt and Daren Schmidt.
Please note that Allante was fully cooperative with the inquiry made by the Colorado Division of Securities and successfully resolved the matter in about 60 days, prior to the issuance of the Press Release. Unfortunately, I have received comments by investors that were confused by the Press Release.
Allante structures its development opportunities with special purpose entities which sell securities to raise capital for acquisition, planning, and construction. Such securities are designed to qualify for exemption from registration under Regulation D of the SEC rules, which means that there are numerous laws which Allante must abide by, both at the state and federal levels. The Colorado Division of Securities looked into and requested documents from three of our offerings and raised two issues that required our attention:
1) Allante, as manager of Tennyson Place, LLC, should have timely filed a Form D with the SEC (and transmitted a copy to the Colorado Division of Securities).
2) We initiated a note offering to investors with whom we had a pre-existing and substantial relationship, under the exemption of Rule 506(b). However, because there was ongoing advertising for a subsequent equity offering under Rule 506(c), we were advised that the two offerings would be deemed joined, which would disqualify our exemptions.
Allante recognized these issues and with our desire to be compliant, took immediate action to resolve them. The Form D was filed for Tennyson Place in September, 2015, and the investments made by the non-accredited investors in Tennyson Place in the Rule 506(b) offering were immediately returned to the investors in August, 2015. No investors were harmed. Without admitting any wrongdoing, we volunteered to enter into a stipulated “cease and desist order” in which we agreed 1) not to offer or sell unregistered securities, 2) not to violate Colorado statues for securities that are being offered or sold, and 3) not to engage in any conduct in violation of the Colorado Securities Act (essentially the same rules which must be followed by all who sell securities). We then proceeded with, and successfully closed, our $8 Million Tennyson Place Offering, with $14 Million of bank-loaned construction financing, and we timely broke ground in November, 2015.
The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is issuing this Investor Alert to educate individual investors about advertisements and announcements for investment opportunities in certain securities offerings. General advertising is permitted in certain offerings as a result of rules adopted by the SEC as required by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act.
You may begin to see advertising and announcements for opportunities to invest in certain securities offerings, some-times called private placements. These offerings may be for shares in a company or interests in a private fund, such as a hedge fund or venture capital fund. The advertising may be through a number of different means, including the Internet, social media, seminars, print, or radio or television broadcast. The rules permitting this general advertising take effect on September 23, 2013.
A securities offering exempt from registration with the SEC is sometimes referred to as a private placement. Under the federal securities laws, a company or private fund may not offer or sell securities unless the offering has been
registered with the SEC or an exemption is available. Private and public companies engage in private placements to raise funds from investors. Private funds, such as hedge funds, also raise investment capital through private placements.
Private placements are not subject to some of the laws and regulations that are designed to protect investors, such as disclosure requirements that apply to registered offerings.
as noted above, the SEC recently adopted rules to permit general solicitation or advertising for certain securities offerings that are exempt from registration. as described below, these offerings, referred to here as Rule 506(c) offerings, must comply with a number of requirements.
Only accredited investors may invest in a Rule 506(c) offering. This limitation exists because these offerings do not have the same investor protections as, and have unique risks when compared to, offerings that are registered with the SEC.
an accredited investor, in the context of an individual investor, is a person who:
had income in excess of $200,000 (or $300,000 with a spouse) in each of the prior two years, and reasonably expects the same for the current year, OR
has a net worth over $1 million, either alone or with a spouse (excluding the value of the person’s primary residence or any loans secured by the residence (up to the value of the residence)).
In a rule 506(c) offering, the company or private fund is required to take reasonable steps to verify your accredited investor status, which could include reviewing documentation, such as W-2s, tax returns, bank and brokerage statements, credit reports and the like. Depending on the circumstances, the company or private fund may rely on a written confirmation from a third party to verify your accredited investor status. The SEC does not require any specific verification method or process for companies or private funds for these offerings.
Third-party verification. If the company or private fund accepts a written confirmation from a third party to verify whether you are an accredited investor, the third party may be a registered broker-dealer, SEC-registered investment adviser, licensed attorney or certified public accountant. The third party could be engaged by the company or private fund, or could be retained by you (e.g., your personal broker-dealer, investment adviser, attorney or certified public accountant). You can obtain information about a registered broker by visiting FInra’s BrokerCheck website. You can obtain information about an investment adviser by visiting the SEC’s Investment adviser Public Disclosure (IaPD) website. You can obtain information about a licensed attorney or certified public accountant by contacting the appropriate state bar or board of accountancy.
You do not have to provide any information if you do not feel comfortable doing so. If you do not provide all of the requested information, you should not be able to invest in the particular offering if the company or private fund is unable to verify that you are an accredited investor.
If the company or private fund offering the securities does not take steps to verify your accredited investor status or allows you to participate in the offering even though you do not meet the income or net worth criteria discussed above, this may be a warning sign that the company or private fund is not complying with the federal securities laws and is something to consider before investing in the offering.
The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is issuing this Investor Bulletin to educate individual investors about what it means to be an “accredited investor.”
Under the federal securities laws, a company or private fund may not offer or sell securities unless the transaction has been registered with the SEC or an exemption from registration is available. Certain securities offerings that are exempt from registration may only be offered to, or purchased by, persons who are accredited investors. One principal purpose of the accredited investor concept is to identify persons who can bear the economic risk of investing in these unregistered securities. Unlike offerings registered with the SEC in which certain information is required to be disclosed, companies and private funds, such as a hedge fund or venture capital fund, engaging in these exempt offerings do not have to make prescribed disclosures to accredited investors. These offerings, sometimes referred to as private placements, involve unique risks and you should be aware that you could lose your entire investment. The SEC recently adopted rules to permit general advertising for certain exempt offerings.
An accredited investor, in the context of a natural person, includes anyone who:
On the income test, the person must satisfy the thresholds for the three years consistently either alone or with a spouse, and cannot, for example,satisfy one year based on individual income and the next two years based on joint income with a spouse. The only exception is if a person is married within this period, in which case the person may satisfy the threshold on the basis of joint income for the years during which the person was married and on the basis of individual income for the other years. In addition, entities such as banks, partnerships, corporations, nonprofits and trusts may be accredited investors. Of the entities that would be considered accredited investors and depending on your circumstances, the following may be relevant to you:
In this context, a sophisticated person means the person must have, or the company or private fund offering the securities reasonably believes that this person has, sufficient knowledge and experience in financial and business matters to evaluate the merits and risks of the prospective investment.
To qualify as an accredited investor under the net worth test, you must have a net worth that exceeds $1 million, either alone or with a spouse. If calculating joint net worth with a spouse, it is not necessary that property be held jointly. Calculating net worth involves adding up all your assets and subtracting all your liabilities. The resulting sum is your net worth.
The value of your primary residence is not included in your net worth calculation. In addition, any mortgage or other loan on the residence does not count as a liability up to the fair market value of the residence. If the loan is for more than the fair market value of the residence (i.e., if your mortgage is underwater), then the loan amount that is over the fair market value counts as a liability under the net worth test. Further, any increase in the loan amount in the 60 days prior to your purchase of the securities (even if the loan amount does not exceed the value of the residence) will count as a liability as well. The reason for this is to prevent net worth from being artificially inflated through converting home equity into cash or other assets.
The following table sets forth examples of calculations under the net worth test for being an accredited investor:
The rules defining accredited investor were changed with the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act to exclude a primary residence from the net worth test. This means that some investors who were accredited investors prior to July 20, 2010 are now not accredited investors. For these investors, any purchase rights, such as preemptive rights or rights of first offer, related to securities that they invested in as accredited investors prior to July 20,2010 are grandfathered in, provided that certain conditions are met. This means that the investor can still exercise these rights even though the investor may not meet the current definition of accredited investor.
For our Investor Bulletin about hedge funds, visit
For our Investor Alert about general advertising for private placements,
For FINRA’s BrokerCheck resource, visit
For our Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) website, visit
For more information about certain exemptions for private placements, visit sec.gov/answers/regd.htm.
For our “Rule 144: Selling Restricted and Control Securities,” visit
For additional investor educational information, see the SEC’s website for individual investors, investor.gov.
The Office of Investor Education and Advocacy has provided this information as a service to investors. It is neither a legal interpretation nor a statement of SEC policy. If you have questions concerning the meaning or application of a particular law or rule, please consult with an attorney who specializes in securities law.
So, what are reasonable steps to verify accredited investor status? The answer is: It depends. The SEC has adopted a “principles-based method” of accredited investor verification, indicating that the reasonable steps that are necessary to give an issuer a “reasonable belief” that all investors are accredited depends on the following factors:
The SEC gives certain examples in the final SEC Regulations implementing Rule506(c), discussing how the reasonable steps necessary to verify accredited investor status depend on the facts and circumstances. For Example, “An issuer that solicits new investors through a website accessible to the general public, through a widely disseminated email or social media solicitation, or through print media, such as a newspaper, will likely be obligated to take greater measures to verify accredited investor status than an issuer that solicits new investors from a database of pre-screened accredited investors created and maintained by a reasonably reliable third party.” Another example is as follows: “…if the terms of the offering require a high minimum investment amount and a purchaser is able to meet those terms,then the likelihood of that purchaser satisfying the definition of accredited investor may be sufficiently high such that, absent any facts that indicate that the purchaser is not an accredited investor, it may be reasonable for the issuer to take fewer steps to verify or, in certain cases, no additional steps to verify accredited investor status other than to confirm that the purchaser’s cash investment is not being financed by a third party.”
Fortunately, in the final release adopting Rule 506(c), the SEC adopted a non-exclusive “safe harbor” to provide some certainty that issuers are complying with the reasonable steps requirement for natural person investors. Provided that the issuer of securities does not otherwise have knowledge that such person is not an accredited investor, the issuer will be deemed to have taken reasonable steps if:
Although the safe harbors outlined above are not mandatory and are non-exclusive, most issuers with individual purchasers will likely take all necessary means to fall within the safe harbors because nobody wants to be one of the SEC’s initial test cases regarding whether the issuer of securities has taken reasonable steps.